Why 'just walk more' is quietly the best advice I give and the hardest to sell
Clients want the interesting answer. Nobody hires a coach hoping to be told the real lever is walking. So I used to hide it inside more interesting-sounding advice, and I have stopped doing that.
The evidence keeps pointing the same direction: daily step count correlates with long-term health outcomes about as strongly as most of the specific training variables people obsess over — rep ranges, exercise selection, split routines. Walking is not a substitute for strength training. It is the base the rest of it sits on, and it is the piece almost everyone under-does.
The reason it is a hard sell is that it does not feel like training. There is no pump, no soreness, no obvious proof of effort. It is the least Instagrammable intervention in fitness, which is exactly why it is under-prescribed relative to how much it actually moves the needle.
My actual advice now, unhidden: get the walk before you optimize the workout. Most of my clients have more room to gain from an extra 3,000 daily steps than from any tweak I could make to their program. It is boring. It is also true.
Comments (2)
Log in to join the conversation.
The least Instagrammable intervention in fitness is such an accurate way to put it.
The least Instagrammable intervention in fitness applies just as much to nutrition. Nobody wants the boring answer even when it's the correct one.